Re: [PATCH v3] skbuff: fix a data race in skb_queue_len()
From: Herbert Xu
Date: Mon Feb 17 2020 - 05:20:21 EST
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 08:39:45AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Not necessarily a big fan of this either, but just for the record here
> in case it helps, while you might complain about instruction size
> blowing up a bit, cycle-wise these wind up being about the same
> anyway. On x86, one instruction != one cycle.
I don't care about that. My problem is with the mindless patches
that started this thread. Look at the patch:
Author: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue Feb 4 13:40:29 2020 -0500
skbuff: fix a data race in skb_queue_len()
It's utter garbage. Why on earth did it change that one instance
of unix_recvq_full? In fact you can see how stupid it is because
right after the call that got changed we again call into
unix_recvq_full which surely would trigger the same warning.
So far the vast majority of the KCSAN patches that have caught
my attention have been of this mindless kind that does not add
any value to the kernel. If anything they could be hiding real
bugs that would now be harder to find.
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt