Re: [PATCH] modpost: return error if module is missing ns imports and MODULE_ALLOW_MISSING_NAMESPACE_IMPORTS=n

From: Matthias Maennich
Date: Mon Feb 17 2020 - 09:56:51 EST


Hi Jessica!

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 03:37:09PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
Currently when CONFIG_MODULE_ALLOW_MISSING_NAMESPACE_IMPORTS=n, modpost only warns
when a module is missing namespace imports. Under this configuration, such a module
cannot be loaded into the kernel anyway, as the module loader would reject it.
We might as well return a build error when a module is missing namespace imports
under CONFIG_MODULE_ALLOW_MISSING_NAMESPACE_IMPORTS=n, so that the build
warning does not go ignored/unnoticed.

I generally agree with the idea of the patch. Thanks for working on
this! I also can't remember any reason why I did not write it like this
initially. Probably just because I introduced this configuration option
quite late in the development process of the initial patches.


Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
scripts/Makefile.modpost | 1 +
scripts/mod/modpost.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.modpost b/scripts/Makefile.modpost
index b4d3f2d122ac..a53660f910a9 100644
--- a/scripts/Makefile.modpost
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.modpost
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ MODPOST = scripts/mod/modpost \
$(if $(KBUILD_EXTMOD),$(addprefix -e ,$(KBUILD_EXTRA_SYMBOLS))) \
$(if $(KBUILD_EXTMOD),-o $(modulesymfile)) \
$(if $(CONFIG_SECTION_MISMATCH_WARN_ONLY),,-E) \
+ $(if $(CONFIG_MODULE_ALLOW_MISSING_NAMESPACE_IMPORTS),,-N) \
$(if $(KBUILD_MODPOST_WARN),-w)

ifdef MODPOST_VMLINUX
diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
index 7edfdb2f4497..53e966f7d557 100644
--- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
+++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ static int sec_mismatch_count = 0;
static int sec_mismatch_fatal = 0;
/* ignore missing files */
static int ignore_missing_files;
+/* Return an error when there are missing namespace imports */
+static int missing_ns_import_error = 0;

A more suitable name is maybe missing_ns_import_is_error or follow the
naming of the config option: allow_missing_ns_imports (with default = 1).


enum export {
export_plain, export_unused, export_gpl,
@@ -2216,9 +2218,15 @@ static int check_exports(struct module *mod)

if (exp->namespace &&
!module_imports_namespace(mod, exp->namespace)) {
- warn("module %s uses symbol %s from namespace %s, but does not import it.\n",
- basename, exp->name, exp->namespace);
- add_namespace(&mod->missing_namespaces, exp->namespace);
+ if (missing_ns_import_error) {
+ merror("module %s uses symbol %s from namespace %s, but does not import it.\n",
+ basename, exp->name, exp->namespace);

I would like to avoid the code duplication here. The string literal is
identical for both cases.

+ err = 1;

Also, if we fail here, we might as well help the user to fix it by
suggesting to run `make nsdeps` (once per failed modpost run). Speaking
of which, `make nsdeps` is currently broken by this patch as it relies
on a successful (yet warning-full) build of the modules. So, in case of
`make nsdeps`, we probably have to omit the -N flag again when invoking
modpost.

Cheers,
Matthias

+ } else {
+ warn("module %s uses symbol %s from namespace %s, but does not import it.\n",
+ basename, exp->name, exp->namespace);
+ }
+ add_namespace(&mod->missing_namespaces, exp->namespace);
}

if (!mod->gpl_compatible)
@@ -2560,7 +2568,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
struct ext_sym_list *extsym_iter;
struct ext_sym_list *extsym_start = NULL;

- while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "i:e:mnsT:o:awEd:")) != -1) {
+ while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "i:e:mnsT:o:awENd:")) != -1) {
switch (opt) {
case 'i':
kernel_read = optarg;
@@ -2598,6 +2606,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
case 'E':
sec_mismatch_fatal = 1;
break;
+ case 'N':
+ missing_ns_import_error = 1;
+ break;
case 'd':
missing_namespace_deps = optarg;
break;
--
2.16.4