Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 18 (sound/soc/codecs/wm5110.c)
From: Mark Brown
Date: Tue Feb 18 2020 - 06:31:21 EST
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:09:59AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> 1) We could update the machine drivers to do an imply as well,
> like the changes to SND_SOC_ALL_CODECS. I think this will
> generally work but doesn't really feel right as you can end up with
> the machine driver built without the CODEC.
Yes, that's not helpful.
> 2) We could update the machine drivers to a depends on and make
> the CODEC symbols manually selectable. I guess this also has the
> advantages that it would be necessary for the simple card stuff
> that seems to be everyones first choice for machine drivers these
That's not good, it means people have to know exactly what CODECs and
DAIs are on their board to even see the config option.
> Mark do you have any strong feelings on this I am leaning towards
Why not just continue adding the relevant dependencies to the machine
drivers like we've always done?
Description: PGP signature