Re: [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: remove set but not used variable 'parent'

[David Sterba]

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:34:53PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 19.02.20 Ð. 13:22 Ñ., yu kuai wrote:
> > Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
> > 
> > fs/btrfs/tree-log.c: In function âwalk_down_log_treeâ:
> > fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:2702:24: warning: variable âparentâ
> > set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> > fs/btrfs/tree-log.c: In function âwalk_up_log_treeâ:
> > fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:2803:26: warning: variable âparentâ
> > set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> > 
> > They are never used, and so can be removed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: yu kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Ah yes, those two are a result of my :
> 
> e084c5ab48f9 ("btrfs: Call btrfs_pin_reserved_extent only during active
> transaction")  (in misc-next branch)
> 
> David perhaps you can squash the two var removals into the original patch?

Yes I'll do that.