Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: spi: Convert QSPI bindings to YAML
From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Wed Feb 19 2020 - 21:29:45 EST
Quoting Akash Asthana (2020-02-17 01:49:33)
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/qcom,spi-qcom-qspi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/qcom,spi-qcom-qspi.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..977070a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/qcom,spi-qcom-qspi.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/spi/qcom,spi-qcom-qspi.yaml#"
> +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"
> +
> +title: Qualcomm Quad Serial Peripheral Interface (QSPI)
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Mukesh Savaliya <msavaliy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + - Akash Asthana <akashast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
Drop the | because it doesn't look like any formatting needs to be
maintained in the text for the description.
> + The QSPI controller allows SPI protocol communication in single, dual, or quad
> + wire transmission modes for read/write access to slaves such as NOR flash.
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: /spi/spi-controller.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + items:
> + - const: qcom,sdm845-qspi
> + - const: qcom,qspi-v1
> +
> + reg:
> + description: Base register location and length.
Drop description? It doesn't seem useful.
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: iface
> + - const: core
> +
> + clocks:
> + items:
> + - description: AHB clock
> + - description: QSPI core clock.
Please drop the full-stop on core clock.
> +
> + "#address-cells":
> + const: 1
> +
> + "#size-cells":
> + const: 0
Aren't these two unnecessary because they're covered by the
spi-controller.yaml binding?
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - interrupts
> + - clock-names
> + - clocks
> + - "#address-cells"
> + - "#size-cells"
These last two are also covered by spi-controller binding.
> +
> +
Why two newlines instead of one?
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdm845.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +
> + soc: soc@0 {
Remove this node from example please.
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + qspi: spi@88df000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-qspi", "qcom,qspi-v1";
> + reg = <0 0x88df000 0 0x600>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 82 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clock-names = "iface", "core";
> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_QSPI_CNOC_PERIPH_AHB_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_QSPI_CORE_CLK>;
Weird tabbing here. Just use spaces and align it up.
> +
> + flash@0 {
> + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> + reg = <0>;
> + spi-max-frequency = <25000000>;
> + spi-tx-bus-width = <2>;
> + spi-rx-bus-width = <2>;
> + };
Is this flash node necessary for the example?
> + };
> + };
> +
Nitpick: Why newline here?
> +...