Re: [PATCH] pwm: bcm2835: Dynamically allocate base
From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Thu Feb 20 2020 - 16:07:24 EST
[Dropping Bart Tanghe from recipents as the address bounces]
Hello Thierry,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:14:00AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 2/4/20 1:17 AM, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 13:35 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> The newer 2711 and 7211 chips have two PWM controllers and failure to
> >> dynamically allocate the PWM base would prevent the second PWM
> >> controller instance being probed for succeeding with an -EEXIST error
> >> from alloc_pwms().
> >>
> >> Fixes: e5a06dc5ac1f ("pwm: Add BCM2835 PWM driver")
> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx>
>
> Thierry, is there any chance we can get this applied for an upcoming
> 5.6-rcX? Thank you!
to assist you with patch sorting:
# revisions < v6 of "Convert period and duty cycle to u64"
pwclient -s Superseded 1237020 1237019 1229049 1229050 1222396
# most of "Add support for Azoteq IQS620A/621/622/624/625" v5 isn't for pwm
pwclient -s "Not Applicable" 1238908 1238907 1238906 1238904 1238903 1238901
# most of "Add support for Azoteq IQS620A/621/622/624/625" v4 isn't for pwm
pwclient -s "Not Applicable" 1224598 1224597 1224596 1224594 1224593 1224592
pwclient -s "Superseeded" 1224595
# "backlight: pwm_bl: Use gpiod_get_value_cansleep() to get initial
# state" already applied by Lee Jones
pwclient -s "Not Applicable" 1031586
# Problem resolved by Michal VokÃÄ
pwclient -s "Rejected" 1059267
(Not sure "Rejected" is the right state.)
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-KÃnig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |