Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Fix synth event test to avoid using smp_processor_id()
From: Tom Zanussi
Date: Thu Feb 20 2020 - 17:56:38 EST
Hi Steve,
On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 17:48 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:52:29 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Since smp_processor_id() requires irq-disabled or preempt-disabled,
> > synth event generation test module made some warnings. To prevent
> > that, use get_cpu()/put_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/synth_event_gen_test.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
>
> I just noticed this patch, after applying my version that just uses
> the
> raw_smp_processor_id(). We don't really care what CPU it is do we?
>
> I didn't want a test to muck with preemption disabling and all that
> fun.
>
Right, we don't really care, it's just to test the trace API - for this
it could even be a constant. I just happened to pick that as an
example, and wasn't expecting unrelated complications.
Tom
> -- Steve