Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] net: mdio: add ipq8064 mdio driver
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin
Date: Thu Feb 20 2020 - 19:40:30 EST
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:26:21AM +0100, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> Currently ipq806x soc use generi bitbang driver to
> comunicate with the gmac ethernet interface.
> Add a dedicated driver created by chunkeey to fix this.
>
> Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 8 ++
> drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/net/phy/mdio-ipq8064.c | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 172 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/phy/mdio-ipq8064.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> index 9dabe03a668c..ec2a5493a7e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> @@ -157,6 +157,14 @@ config MDIO_I2C
>
> This is library mode.
>
> +config MDIO_IPQ8064
> + tristate "Qualcomm IPQ8064 MDIO interface support"
> + depends on HAS_IOMEM && OF_MDIO
> + depends on MFD_SYSCON
> + help
> + This driver supports the MDIO interface found in the network
> + interface units of the IPQ8064 SoC
> +
> config MDIO_MOXART
> tristate "MOXA ART MDIO interface support"
> depends on ARCH_MOXART || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/Makefile b/drivers/net/phy/Makefile
> index fe5badf13b65..8f02bd2089f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Makefile
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_CAVIUM) += mdio-cavium.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_GPIO) += mdio-gpio.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_HISI_FEMAC) += mdio-hisi-femac.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_I2C) += mdio-i2c.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_IPQ8064) += mdio-ipq8064.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_MOXART) += mdio-moxart.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_MSCC_MIIM) += mdio-mscc-miim.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_OCTEON) += mdio-octeon.o
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio-ipq8064.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio-ipq8064.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e974a6f5d5ef
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio-ipq8064.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +//
> +// Qualcomm IPQ8064 MDIO interface driver
> +//
> +// Copyright (C) 2019 Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@xxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/of_mdio.h>
> +#include <linux/phy.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> +
> +/* MII address register definitions */
> +#define MII_ADDR_REG_ADDR 0x10
> +#define MII_BUSY BIT(0)
> +#define MII_WRITE BIT(1)
> +#define MII_CLKRANGE_60_100M (0 << 2)
> +#define MII_CLKRANGE_100_150M (1 << 2)
> +#define MII_CLKRANGE_20_35M (2 << 2)
> +#define MII_CLKRANGE_35_60M (3 << 2)
> +#define MII_CLKRANGE_150_250M (4 << 2)
> +#define MII_CLKRANGE_250_300M (5 << 2)
> +#define MII_CLKRANGE_MASK GENMASK(4, 2)
> +#define MII_REG_SHIFT 6
> +#define MII_REG_MASK GENMASK(10, 6)
> +#define MII_ADDR_SHIFT 11
> +#define MII_ADDR_MASK GENMASK(15, 11)
> +
> +#define MII_DATA_REG_ADDR 0x14
> +
> +#define MII_MDIO_DELAY (1000)
Maybe name this MII_MDIO_DELAY_USEC to show that it is in microseconds?
> +#define MII_MDIO_RETRY (10)
Maybe name this MII_MDIO_RETRY_MSEC to show that it is in milliseconds?
> +
> +struct ipq8064_mdio {
> + struct regmap *base; /* NSS_GMAC0_BASE */
> +};
> +
> +static int
> +ipq8064_mdio_wait_busy(struct ipq8064_mdio *priv)
> +{
> + u32 busy;
> +
> + return regmap_read_poll_timeout(priv->base, MII_ADDR_REG_ADDR, busy,
> + !(busy & MII_BUSY), MII_MDIO_DELAY,
> + MII_MDIO_RETRY * USEC_PER_MSEC);
Thanks.
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +ipq8064_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_addr, int reg_offset)
> +{
> + struct ipq8064_mdio *priv = bus->priv;
> + u32 miiaddr = MII_BUSY | MII_CLKRANGE_250_300M;
> + u32 ret_val;
> + int err;
> +
> + /* Reject clause 45 */
> + if (reg_offset & MII_ADDR_C45)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Thanks.
> +
> + miiaddr |= ((phy_addr << MII_ADDR_SHIFT) & MII_ADDR_MASK) |
> + ((reg_offset << MII_REG_SHIFT) & MII_REG_MASK);
> +
> + regmap_write(priv->base, MII_ADDR_REG_ADDR, miiaddr);
> + usleep_range(10, 20);
> +
> + err = ipq8064_mdio_wait_busy(priv);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + regmap_read(priv->base, MII_DATA_REG_ADDR, &ret_val);
> + return (int)ret_val;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +ipq8064_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_addr, int reg_offset, u16 data)
> +{
> + struct ipq8064_mdio *priv = bus->priv;
> + u32 miiaddr = MII_WRITE | MII_BUSY | MII_CLKRANGE_250_300M;
> +
> + /* Reject clause 45 */
> + if (reg_offset & MII_ADDR_C45)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Thanks.
> +
> + regmap_write(priv->base, MII_DATA_REG_ADDR, data);
> +
> + miiaddr |= ((phy_addr << MII_ADDR_SHIFT) & MII_ADDR_MASK) |
> + ((reg_offset << MII_REG_SHIFT) & MII_REG_MASK);
> +
> + regmap_write(priv->base, MII_ADDR_REG_ADDR, miiaddr);
> + usleep_range(10, 20);
> +
> + return ipq8064_mdio_wait_busy(priv);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +ipq8064_mdio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + struct ipq8064_mdio *priv;
> + struct mii_bus *bus;
> + int ret;
> +
> + bus = devm_mdiobus_alloc_size(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv));
> + if (!bus)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + bus->name = "ipq8064_mdio_bus";
> + bus->read = ipq8064_mdio_read;
> + bus->write = ipq8064_mdio_write;
> + snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s-mii", dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> + bus->parent = &pdev->dev;
> +
> + priv = bus->priv;
> + priv->base = syscon_node_to_regmap(np);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->base)) {
> + priv->base = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "master");
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->base)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "master phandle not found\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
I'm curious why you've kept this as-is given my comments?
If you don't agree with them, it would be helpful to reply to the
review email giving the reasons why.
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up