Re: [PATCH 3/3] irqchip: xilinx: Use handle_domain_irq()

From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Fri Feb 21 2020 - 06:46:56 EST


On 2020-02-12 08:39, Michal Simek wrote:
Call generic domain specific irq handler which does the most of things
self. Also get rid of concurrent_irq counting which hasn't been exported
anywhere.
Based on this loop was also optimized by using do/while loop instead of
goto loop.

Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Asserhall <stefan.asserhall@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

arch/microblaze/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c | 5 ----
drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c | 44 +++++++++++--------------------
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/microblaze/Kconfig b/arch/microblaze/Kconfig
index 3a314aa2efa1..242f58ec086b 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/microblaze/Kconfig
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ config MICROBLAZE
select MMU_GATHER_NO_RANGE if MMU
select SPARSE_IRQ
select GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
+ select HANDLE_DOMAIN_IRQ

# Endianness selection
choice
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c
index 1f8cb4c4f74f..0b37dde60a1e 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c
@@ -22,13 +22,8 @@

void __irq_entry do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
trace_hardirqs_off();
-
- irq_enter();
handle_arch_irq(regs);
- irq_exit();
- set_irq_regs(old_regs);
trace_hardirqs_on();
}

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
b/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
index ad9e678c24ac..fa468e618762 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
@@ -125,20 +125,6 @@ static unsigned int xintc_get_irq_local(struct
xintc_irq_chip *irqc)
return irq;
}

-static unsigned int xintc_get_irq(void)
-{
- u32 hwirq;
- unsigned int irq = -1;
-
- hwirq = xintc_read(primary_intc, IVR);
- if (hwirq != -1U)
- irq = irq_find_mapping(primary_intc->root_domain, hwirq);
-
- pr_debug("irq-xilinx: hwirq=%d, irq=%d\n", hwirq, irq);
-
- return irq;
-}
-
static int xintc_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
irq_hw_number_t hw)
{
struct xintc_irq_chip *irqc = d->host_data;
@@ -178,23 +164,23 @@ static void xil_intc_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
}

-static u32 concurrent_irq;
-
static void xil_intc_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- unsigned int irq;
-
- irq = xintc_get_irq();
-next_irq:
- BUG_ON(!irq);
- generic_handle_irq(irq);
-
- irq = xintc_get_irq();
- if (irq != -1U) {
- pr_debug("next irq: %d\n", irq);
- ++concurrent_irq;
- goto next_irq;
- }
+ u32 hwirq;
+ struct xintc_irq_chip *irqc = primary_intc;
+
+ do {
+ hwirq = xintc_read(irqc, IVR);
+ if (hwirq != -1U) {
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = handle_domain_irq(irqc->root_domain, hwirq, regs);
+ WARN_ONCE(ret, "Unhandled HWIRQ %d\n", hwirq);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ break;
+ } while (1);

OK, so this what I suggested already. Just squash the two patches
in one, there is no point in keeping them separate.

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...