Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] Bindings: nvmem: add bindings for JZ4780 efuse

[H. Nikolaus Schaller]

> Am 22.02.2020 um 11:54 schrieb Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:25:37 +0100
> "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> From: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> This patch brings support for the JZ4780 efuse. Currently it only exposes
>> a read only access to the entire 8K bits efuse memory.
>> 
>> Tested-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> [converted to yaml]
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/nvmem/ingenic,jz4780-efuse.yaml  | 50 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/ingenic,jz4780-efuse.yaml
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/ingenic,jz4780-efuse.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/ingenic,jz4780-efuse.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..09a8ef937750
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/ingenic,jz4780-efuse.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/ingenic,jz4780-efuse.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Ingenic JZ EFUSE driver bindings
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> +  - PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@xxxxxxxxx>
>> +
>> +allOf:
>> +  - $ref: "nvmem.yaml#"
>> +
>> +properties:
>> +  compatible:
>> +    enum:
>> +      - ingenic,jz4780-efuse
>> +
>> +  reg:
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +  clocks:
>> +    # Handle for the ahb for the efuse.
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +  clock-names:
>> +   items:
>> +     - const:  ahb2
>> +
>> +required:
>> +  - compatible
>> +  - reg
>> +  - clock-names
> - clocks ?
> 
> In my first try there was "clock" without s which
> caused the trouble.

Ah, ok. Seems I have mis-interpreted this.

BR and thanks,
Nikolaus