Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: add mediatek mipi csi driver v 0.5

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 16/05/2023 11:41, Julien Stephan wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 10:07:47AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 15/05/2023 11:05, Julien Stephan wrote:
>>> From: Florian Sylvestre <fsylvestre@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> This adds the bindings, for the MIPI CD-PHY module v 0.5 embedded in
>>> some Mediatek soc, such as the mt8365
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Sylvestre <fsylvestre@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Julien Stephan <jstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> What are the changes? IOW: changelog here or in cover letter.
>>
> Hi Krzysztof,
> I added a changelog in the cover letter, but I will try to be more
> descritpive next time. Changes from v1 are mainly style issues fixed
> (mostly from your first review)

What do you mean by "in cover letter"? There is no cover letter.

> 
>> Subject: you have some multiple spaces.
>>
>> Subject: drop driver. Bindings are not for drivers.
>>
>>> ---
>>>  .../phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5.yaml        | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  MAINTAINERS                                   |  6 ++
>>>  2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..5aa8c0b41cdf
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-Only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Mediatek Sensor Interface MIPI CSI CD-PHY
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Julien Stephan <jstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> +  - Andy Hsieh <andy.hsieh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> +
>>> +description:
>>> +  The SENINF CD-PHY is a set of CD-PHY connected to the SENINF CSI-2
>>> +  receivers. The number of PHYs depends on the SoC model.
>>> +  Depending on the soc model, each PHYs can support CDPHY or DPHY only
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    enum:
>>> +      - mediatek,phy-mipi-csi-0-5
>>
>> SoC based compatibles. 0-5 is odd.
>>
>>> +
>>> +  reg:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  '#phy-cells':
>>> +    const: 0
>>> +
>>> +  mediatek,is_cdphy:
>>
>> No underscores in node names.
>>
>>> +    description:
>>> +      Specify if the current phy support CDPHY configuration
>>
>> Why this cannot be implied from compatible? Add specific compatibles.
>>
>>
> This cannot be implied by compatible because the number of phys depends
> on the soc and each phy can be either D-PHY only or CD-PHY capable.
> For example mt8365 has 2 phy: CSI0 and CSI1. CSI1 is DPHY only and CSI0 is CD-PHY

So it is SoC specific so why it cannot be implied by compatible? I don't
understand. You will have SoC specific compatibles, right? or you just
ignored my comments here?

>>

Best regards,
Krzysztof