Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] clk: divider: Properly handle rates exceeding UINT_MAX
From: Christopher Obbard
Date: Sat May 20 2023 - 03:57:50 EST
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 21:05 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Requesting rates exceeding UINT_MAX (so roughly 4.3 GHz) results
> in very small rate being chosen instead of very high ones, since
> DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL takes a 32 bit integer as second argument.
>
> Correct this by using DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP instead, which takes proper
> 64 bit values for dividend and divisor.
>
> Note, that this is usually not an issue. ULONG_MAX sets the lower
> 32 bits and thus effectively requests UINT_MAX. On most platforms
> that is good enough. To trigger a real bug one of the following
> conditions must be met:
>
> * A parent clock with more than 8.5 GHz is available
> * Instead of ULONG_MAX a specific frequency like 4.3 GHz is
> requested. That would end up becoming 5 MHz instead :)
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
This patch series fixes the error on Rockchip RK3588 on ROCK 5 Model B.
Tested-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk-divider.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> index a2c2b5203b0a..dddaaf0f9d25 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static int _div_round_up(const struct clk_div_table *table,
> unsigned long parent_rate, unsigned long rate,
> unsigned long flags)
> {
> - int div = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)parent_rate, rate);
> + int div = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, rate);
>
> if (flags & CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO)
> div = __roundup_pow_of_two(div);
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int _div_round_closest(const struct clk_div_table *table,
> int up, down;
> unsigned long up_rate, down_rate;
>
> - up = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)parent_rate, rate);
> + up = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, rate);
> down = parent_rate / rate;
>
> if (flags & CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO) {
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ int divider_get_val(unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate,
> {
> unsigned int div, value;
>
> - div = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)parent_rate, rate);
> + div = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, rate);
>
> if (!_is_valid_div(table, div, flags))
> return -EINVAL;
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>