Re: [PATCH][next] wifi: rtw89: coex: Fix __write_overflow_field error

From: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Date: Tue May 23 2023 - 22:32:28 EST




On 5/23/23 20:21, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:


-----Original Message-----
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:13 AM
To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PATCH][next] wifi: rtw89: coex: Fix __write_overflow_field error

One-element arrays as fake flexible arrays are deprecated, and we are
moving towards adopting C99 flexible-array members instead.

Fix the following error seen under GCC-13 and -fstrict-flex-arrays=3:
In function ‘fortify_memcpy_chk’,
inlined from ‘_append_tdma’ at drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:1579:3:
include/linux/fortify-string.h:583:25: error: call to ‘__write_overflow_field’ declared with attribute
warning: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()?
[-Werror=attribute-warning]
583 | __write_overflow_field(p_size_field, size);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This helps with the ongoing efforts to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE
routines on memcpy() and help us make progress towards globally
enabling -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 [1].

This results in no differences in binary output.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/299
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602902.html [1]
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
index 3a586a971e8f..bda0e1e99a8c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static const struct rtw89_btc_ver rtw89_btc_ver_defs[] = {
struct rtw89_btc_btf_tlv {
u8 type;
u8 len;
- u8 val[1];
+ u8 val[];
} __packed;

enum btc_btf_set_report_en {

Arnd has sent the same patch [1] as yours.

Oh that's great! What a coincidence. :)

Thanks for letting me know.
--
Gustavo


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/27a7010de8be4006a3e4b95e851781c6@xxxxxxxxxxx/T/#mca619c8261b87b88eedd391ceafb34c40d513ce5