Re: [net-next PATCH v5 3/9] net: phy: add devm/of_phy_package_join helper

From: Antoine Tenart
Date: Thu Feb 01 2024 - 11:41:05 EST


Quoting Christian Marangi (2024-02-01 16:17:29)
> +/**
> + * of_phy_package_join - join a common PHY group in PHY package
> + * @phydev: target phy_device struct
> + * @priv_size: if non-zero allocate this amount of bytes for private data
> + *
> + * This is a variant of phy_package_join for PHY package defined in DT.
> + *
> + * The parent node of the @phydev is checked as a valid PHY package node
> + * structure (by matching the node name "ethernet-phy-package") and the
> + * base_addr for the PHY package is passed to phy_package_join.
> + *
> + * With this configuration the shared struct will also have the np value
> + * filled to use additional DT defined properties in PHY specific
> + * probe_once and config_init_once PHY package OPs.
> + *
> + * Returns < 1 on error, 0 on success. Esp. calling phy_package_join()

So, < 0 on error ?

> +int of_phy_package_join(struct phy_device *phydev, size_t priv_size)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node = phydev->mdio.dev.of_node;
> + struct device_node *package_node;
> + u32 base_addr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!node)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + package_node = of_get_parent(node);

Is the node put on package leave?

> + if (!package_node)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!of_node_name_eq(package_node, "ethernet-phy-package")

of_put_node? + below.

> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(package_node, "reg", &base_addr))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = phy_package_join(phydev, base_addr, priv_size);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + phydev->shared->np = package_node;

Just looked quickly, looks like ->np is uninitialized in the !of join
case.

> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_phy_package_join);