Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal/of: Assume polling-delay(-passive) 0 when absent

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 01:11:16PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Currently, thermal zones associated with providers that have interrupts
> for signaling hot/critical trips are required to set a polling-delay
> of 0 to indicate no polling. This feels a bit backwards.
> 
> Change the code such that "no polling delay" also means "no polling".
> 
> Suggested-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>

Regards,
Bjorn

> ---
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c
> index 4d6c22e0ed85..61bbd42aa2cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c
> @@ -225,14 +225,18 @@ static int thermal_of_monitor_init(struct device_node *np, int *delay, int *pdel
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "polling-delay-passive", pdelay);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		pr_err("%pOFn: missing polling-delay-passive property\n", np);
> +	if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> +		*pdelay = 0;
> +	} else if (ret < 0) {
> +		pr_err("%pOFn: Couldn't get polling-delay-passive: %d\n", np, ret);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "polling-delay", delay);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		pr_err("%pOFn: missing polling-delay property\n", np);
> +	if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> +		*delay = 0;
> +	} else if (ret < 0) {
> +		pr_err("%pOFn: Couldn't get polling-delay: %d\n", np, ret);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> 
> -- 
> 2.40.1
>