Re: [BUG] workqueues and printk not playing nice since next-20240130

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 06:56:28AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 08:35:51AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Good point, and if this sort of thing happens frequently, perhaps there
> > should be an easy way of doing this.  One crude hack that might come
> > pretty close would be to redefine the barrier() macro to be smp_mb().
> > 
> > But as noted earlier, -ENOREPRODUCE on today's -next.  I will try the
> > next several -next releases.  But if they all get -ENOREPRODUCE, I owe
> > everyone on CC an apology for having sent this report out before trying
> > next-20240202.  :-/
> 
> I think I saw that problem too but could reproduce it with or without the
> workqueue changes, so I did the lazy thing "oh well, somebody is gonna fix
> that" and just tested as-is. It's a bit worrying that ppl don't seem to
> already know what the culprit is. Hmm... I can't reproduce it anymore
> either.

Glad that it is not just me!  I think...  ;-)

> So, there is some chance that this may really be a subtle breakage. If you
> ever see it happening again, triggering sysrq-t and capturing the dmesg
> output (network should still work fine, so these shouldn't be too difficult)
> may help. sysrq-t has workqueue state dump at the end which should clearly
> indicate if anything is stalled in workqueue.

Good point, if it does recur, I could try it on bare metal.

> That said, another data point. In my test setup, I use the earlyprintk boot
> option which enables console output way before than workqueue becomes
> operational, so having on console output at all is highly unlikely to be
> indicative of workqueue problem. My memory is hazy but it seems like I can
> no longer reproduce the problem on the same git commit. Maybe it was a
> problem on the qemu side?

It might have been a qemu issue, but I am using the same qemu. 

No idea!

But I will try earlyprintk if this happens again.

							Thanx, Paul