Re: [PATCH v1 08/18] thermal: intel: pch_thermal: Migrate to thermal_zone_device_register()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 11:10 AM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Il 01/02/24 20:51, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:13 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> > <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> The thermal API has a new thermal_zone_device_register() function which
> >> is deprecating the older thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips() and
> >> thermal_tripless_zone_device_register().
> >>
> >> Migrate to the new thermal zone device registration function.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c | 12 ++++++++----
> >>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
> >> index b3905e34c507..73d7c2ac7dbc 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_pch_thermal.c
> >> @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static int intel_pch_thermal_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >>                                     const struct pci_device_id *id)
> >>   {
> >>          enum pch_board_ids board_id = id->driver_data;
> >> +       struct thermal_zone_device_params tzdp;
> >>          struct pch_thermal_device *ptd;
> >>          int nr_trips = 0;
> >>          u16 trip_temp;
> >> @@ -233,10 +234,13 @@ static int intel_pch_thermal_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >>
> >>          nr_trips += pch_wpt_add_acpi_psv_trip(ptd, nr_trips);
> >>
> >> -       ptd->tzd = thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips(board_names[board_id],
> >> -                                                          ptd->trips, nr_trips,
> >> -                                                          0, ptd, &tzd_ops,
> >> -                                                          NULL, 0, 0);
> >> +       tzdp.tzp.type = board_names[board_id];
> >> +       tzdp.tzp.devdata = ptd;
> >> +       tzdp.tzp.trips = ptd->trips;
> >> +       tzdp.tzp.num_trips = nr_trips;
> >> +       tzdp.tzp.ops = &tzd_ops;
> >> +
> >> +       ptd->tzd = thermal_zone_device_register(&tzdp);
> >
> > IMV, this should be
> >
> > ptd->tzd = thermal_zone_device_register(board_names[board_id],
> > ptd->trips, nr_trips, &tzd_ops, ptd, NULL);
> >
> > and the tzdp variable is not necessary even.
> >
>
> The whole point of thermal_zone_device_register() taking just one parameter was
> that those older functions were taking a bit too many params, and with the
> introduction of Thermal Zone name we'd be adding even more.

That's fair.

However, as indicated elsewhere, there are at least a few arguments of
the registration function that fit into the argument list: trips[],
num_trips, ops, devdata.

I'd add the name to that list and put the rest (including type) into
the params struct.

> For intel_pch_thermal, things are more or less the same, assignments are done there
> line by line... but for most of the others, IMO it's easier and schematized as a
> single stack-initialized structure that could even be constified in the future.

Well, it's copied into the struct thermal_zone_device, so it's better
to put it one the stack, so the memory occupied by it gets freed when
not needed any more.