Re: [PATCH 1/1] hugetlb: fix CONFIG_PADATA dependency for non-SMP system

[Gang Li]

On 2024/2/4 15:44, Muchun Song wrote:
> I don't think it is a clear way to fix this. If someone want to
> use PADATA in a non-SMP system, he should be carefully to handle
> the non-SMP case himself. I think the better way is to make PADATA
> handle the non-SMP case, I think it should be easy for it, which
> could just call ->thread_fn() many times instead of creating many
> threads in the non-SMP case.
>
> Thanks.

Sounds good, I'll take a look at padata and send a new patch.