Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: mediatek,xfi-tphy: add new bindings

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 04/02/2024 07:17, Chunfeng Yun (云春峰) wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 09:21 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>  	 
>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
>> you have verified the sender or the content.
>>  On 01/02/2024 22:52, Daniel Golle wrote:
>>> Add bindings for the MediaTek XFI T-PHY Ethernet SerDes PHY found
>> in the
>>> MediaTek MT7988 SoC which can operate at various interfaces modes:
>>>
>>> via USXGMII PCS:
>>>  * USXGMII
>>>  * 10GBase-R
>>>  * 5GBase-R
>>>
>>> via LynxI SGMII PCS:
>>>  * 2500Base-X
>>>  * 1000Base-X
>>>  * Cisco SGMII (MAC side)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  .../bindings/phy/mediatek,xfi-tphy.yaml       | 80
>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,xfi-tphy.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,xfi-
>> tphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,xfi-
>> tphy.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000000000..e897118dcf7e6
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,xfi-tphy.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/mediatek,xfi-tphy.yaml#
>>
>> Please use compatible as filename. Your binding says only one is
>> possible (const, not enum), so there is no reasoning for different
>> filename.
>>
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: MediaTek XFI T-PHY
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Daniel Golle <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> +
>>> +description:
>>> +  The MediaTek XFI SerDes T-PHY provides the physical SerDes lanes
>>> +  used by the (10G/5G) USXGMII PCS and (1G/2.5G) LynxI PCS found
>> in
>>> +  MediaTek's 10G-capabale SoCs.
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  $nodename:
>>> +    pattern: "^phy@[0-9a-f]+$"
>>
>> No need for nodename in individual bindings file.
>>
>>> +
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    const: mediatek,mt7988-xfi-tphy
> Add a generic compatible "mediatek,xfi-tphy"?
> 
> Other socs also use this phy but not upstream.

Are they here? No... They will use this one as fallback. Stop insisting
on some generic fallbacks just because you do not like using other SoCs
as fallbacks.

You ignored other comments, so I understand you agree with them 100%.

Best regards,
Krzysztof