Re: [PATCH 00/18] mfd: convert to use maple tree register cache

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Tue Feb 06 2024 - 04:33:49 EST


Hi Bo,

CC broonie

Thanks for your series!

On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 8:16 AM Bo Liu <liubo03@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The maple tree register cache is based on a much more modern data structure
> than the rbtree cache and makes optimisation choices which are probably

probably?

> more appropriate for modern systems than those made by the rbtree cache.
>
> Bo Liu (18):
> mfd: ac100: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: as3711: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: as3722: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: axp20x: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: bcm590xx: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: bd9571mwv: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: dialog: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: khadas-mcu: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: lochnagar-i2c: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: wolfson: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: rohm: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: rk8xx: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: rn5t618: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: rsmu_i2c: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: si476x: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: stmfx: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: stpmic1: convert to use maple tree register cache
> mfd: rc5t583: convert to use maple tree register cache

If all of this is true, is there any reason to keep REGCACHE_RBTREE
around? If not, perhaps REGCACHE_RBTREE should be treated as
REGCACHE_MAPLE in the regmap core code first, followed by a single
tree-wide patch to replace REGCACHE_RBTREE?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert


--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68korg

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds