Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the block tree

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Tue Feb 06 2024 - 08:45:33 EST


On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 12:12 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:11 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) produced these warnings:
> >
> > In file included from /home/sfr/next/next/include/linux/bits.h:6,
> > from /home/sfr/next/next/include/linux/bitops.h:6,
> > from /home/sfr/next/next/include/linux/kernel.h:23,
> > from /home/sfr/next/next/io_uring/nop.c:2:
> > /home/sfr/next/next/include/vdso/bits.h:7:40: warning: left shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
> > 7 | #define BIT(nr) (UL(1) << (nr))
> > | ^~
> > /home/sfr/next/next/include/linux/io_uring_types.h:538:35: note: in expansion of macro 'BIT'
> > 538 | REQ_F_CAN_POLL = BIT(REQ_F_CAN_POLL_BIT),
> > | ^~~
> >
> > (and mny more similar)
> >
> > Introduced by commit
> >
> > d964e8440442 ("io_uring: add io_file_can_poll() helper")
> >
> > REQ_F_CAN_POLL_BIT is 32.
>
> All of these BIT() have to be changed to BIT_ULL().
> And let's hope all variables used for storing these flags have been
> changed from unsigned long to u64...

I have sent a fix
https://lore.kernel.org/1960190f37b94276df50d382b9f1488cd6b6e662.1707226862git.geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68korg

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds