Re: [PATCH] pidfd: getfd should always report ESRCH if a task is exiting

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 02/06, Tycho Andersen wrote:
>
> From: Tycho Andersen <tandersen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> We can get EBADF from __pidfd_fget() if a task is currently exiting, which
> might be confusing.

agreed, because EBADF looks as if the "fd" argument was wrong,

> Let's check PF_EXITING, and just report ESRCH if so.

agreed, we can pretend that the task has already exited,

But:

> --- a/kernel/pid.c
> +++ b/kernel/pid.c
> @@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ static int pidfd_getfd(struct pid *pid, int fd)
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	task = get_pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
> -	if (!task)
> +	if (!task || task->flags & PF_EXITING)
>  		return -ESRCH;

This looks racy. Suppose that pidfd_getfd() races with the exiting task.

It is possible that this task sets PF_EXITING and does exit_files()
after the "task->flags & PF_EXITING" check above and before pidfd_getfd()
does __pidfd_fget(), in this case pidfd_getfd() still returns the same
EBADF we want to avoid.

Perhaps we can change pidfd_getfd() to do

	if (IS_ERR(file))
		return (task->flags & PF_EXITING) ? -ESRCH : PTR_ERR(file);

instead?

This needs a comment to explain the PF_EXITING check. And perhaps another
comment to explain that we can't miss PF_EXITING if the target task has
already passed exit_files, both exit_files() and fget_task() take the same
task_lock(task).

What do you think?

Oleg.