Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/kprobes: Boost more instructions from grp2/3/4/5

From: Google
Date: Tue Feb 06 2024 - 18:41:08 EST


On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 22:39:32 -0600
Jinghao Jia <jinghao7@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2/4/24 06:09, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Feb 2024 21:13:00 -0600
> > Jinghao Jia <jinghao7@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> With the instruction decoder, we are now able to decode and recognize
> >> instructions with opcode extensions. There are more instructions in
> >> these groups that can be boosted:
> >>
> >> Group 2: ROL, ROR, RCL, RCR, SHL/SAL, SHR, SAR
> >> Group 3: TEST, NOT, NEG, MUL, IMUL, DIV, IDIV
> >> Group 4: INC, DEC (byte operation)
> >> Group 5: INC, DEC (word/doubleword/quadword operation)
> >>
> >> These instructions are not boosted previously because there are reserved
> >> opcodes within the groups, e.g., group 2 with ModR/M.nnn == 110 is
> >> unmapped. As a result, kprobes attached to them requires two int3 traps
> >> as being non-boostable also prevents jump-optimization.
> >>
> >> Some simple tests on QEMU show that after boosting and jump-optimization
> >> a single kprobe on these instructions with an empty pre-handler runs 10x
> >> faster (~1000 cycles vs. ~100 cycles).
> >>
> >> Since these instructions are mostly ALU operations and do not touch
> >> special registers like RIP, let's boost them so that we get the
> >> performance benefit.
> >>
> >
> > This looks good to me. And can you check how many instructions in the
> > vmlinux will be covered by this change typically?
> >
>
> I collected the stats from the LLVM CodeGen backend on kernel version 6.7.3
> using Gentoo's dist-kernel config (with a mod2yesconfig to make modules
> builtin) and here are the number of Grp 2/3/4/5 instructions that are newly
> covered by this patch:
>
> Kernel total # of insns: 28552017 (from objdump)
> Grp2 insns: 286249 (from LLVM)
> Grp3 insns: 286556 (from LLVM)
> Grp4 insns: 5832 (from LLVM)
> Grp5 insns: 146314 (from LLVM)
>
> Note that using LLVM means we miss the stats from inline assembly and
> assembly source files.

Thanks for checking! so it increases the coverage ~2.5% :)

Thank you,


>
> --Jinghao
>
> > Thank you,
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Jinghao Jia <jinghao7@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> >> index 7a08d6a486c8..530f6d4b34f4 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> >> @@ -169,22 +169,33 @@ bool can_boost(struct insn *insn, void *addr)
> >> case 0x62: /* bound */
> >> case 0x70 ... 0x7f: /* Conditional jumps */
> >> case 0x9a: /* Call far */
> >> - case 0xc0 ... 0xc1: /* Grp2 */
> >> case 0xcc ... 0xce: /* software exceptions */
> >> - case 0xd0 ... 0xd3: /* Grp2 */
> >> case 0xd6: /* (UD) */
> >> case 0xd8 ... 0xdf: /* ESC */
> >> case 0xe0 ... 0xe3: /* LOOP*, JCXZ */
> >> case 0xe8 ... 0xe9: /* near Call, JMP */
> >> case 0xeb: /* Short JMP */
> >> case 0xf0 ... 0xf4: /* LOCK/REP, HLT */
> >> - case 0xf6 ... 0xf7: /* Grp3 */
> >> - case 0xfe: /* Grp4 */
> >> /* ... are not boostable */
> >> return false;
> >> + case 0xc0 ... 0xc1: /* Grp2 */
> >> + case 0xd0 ... 0xd3: /* Grp2 */
> >> + /*
> >> + * AMD uses nnn == 110 as SHL/SAL, but Intel makes it reserved.
> >> + */
> >> + return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) != 0b110;
> >> + case 0xf6 ... 0xf7: /* Grp3 */
> >> + /* AMD uses nnn == 001 as TEST, but Intel makes it reserved. */
> >> + return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) != 0b001;
> >> + case 0xfe: /* Grp4 */
> >> + /* Only INC and DEC are boostable */
> >> + return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 0b000 ||
> >> + X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 0b001;
> >> case 0xff: /* Grp5 */
> >> - /* Only indirect jmp is boostable */
> >> - return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 4;
> >> + /* Only INC, DEC, and indirect JMP are boostable */
> >> + return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 0b000 ||
> >> + X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 0b001 ||
> >> + X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 0b100;
> >> default:
> >> return true;
> >> }
> >> --
> >> 2.43.0
> >>
> >
> >


--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>