On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 10:52 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK is not negotiated, we expect
the driver to enable virtqueue before setting DRIVER_OK. If the driver
tries anyway, better to fail right away as soon as we get the ioctl.
Let's also update the documentation to make it clearer.
We had a problem in QEMU for not meeting this requirement, see
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20240202132521.32714-1-kwolf@xxxxxxxxxx/
Maybe it's better to only enable cvq when the backend supports
VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK. Eugenio, any comment on this?
Fixes: 9f09fd6171fe ("vdpa: accept VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK backend feature")
Cc: eperezma@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h | 3 ++-
drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h
index d7656908f730..5df49b6021a7 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h
@@ -182,7 +182,8 @@ struct vhost_vdpa_iova_range {
/* Device can be resumed */
#define VHOST_BACKEND_F_RESUME 0x5
/* Device supports the driver enabling virtqueues both before and after
- * DRIVER_OK
+ * DRIVER_OK. If this feature is not negotiated, the virtqueues must be
+ * enabled before setting DRIVER_OK.
*/
#define VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK 0x6
/* Device may expose the virtqueue's descriptor area, driver area and
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
index bc4a51e4638b..1fba305ba8c1 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
@@ -651,6 +651,10 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_vring_ioctl(struct vhost_vdpa *v, unsigned int cmd,
case VHOST_VDPA_SET_VRING_ENABLE:
if (copy_from_user(&s, argp, sizeof(s)))
return -EFAULT;
+ if (!vhost_backend_has_feature(vq,
+ VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK) &&
+ (ops->get_status(vdpa) & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK))
+ return -EINVAL;
As discussed, without VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK, we don't
know if parents can do vq_ready after driver_ok.
So maybe we need to keep this behaviour to unbreak some "legacy" userspace?
For example ifcvf did:
static void ifcvf_vdpa_set_vq_ready(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
u16 qid, bool ready)
{
struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
ifcvf_set_vq_ready(vf, qid, ready);
}
And it did:
void ifcvf_set_vq_ready(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, bool ready)
{
struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
vp_iowrite16(qid, &cfg->queue_select);
vp_iowrite16(ready, &cfg->queue_enable);
}
Though it didn't advertise VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK?
Adding LingShan for more thought.
Thanks
ops->set_vq_ready(vdpa, idx, s.num);
return 0;
case VHOST_VDPA_GET_VRING_GROUP:
--
2.43.0