Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] tracing the source of errors

[Jan Kara]

On Wed 07-02-24 10:54:34, Miklos Szeredi via Lsf-pc wrote:
> [I'm not planning to attend LSF this year, but I thought this topic
> might be of interest to those who will.]
> 
> The errno thing is really ancient and yet quite usable.  But when
> trying to find out where a particular EINVAL is coming from, that's
> often mission impossible.
> 
> Would it make sense to add infrastructure to allow tracing the source
> of errors?  E.g.
> 
> strace --errno-trace ls -l foo
> ...
> statx(AT_FDCWD, "foo", ...) = -1 ENOENT [fs/namei.c:1852]
> ...
> 
> Don't know about others, but this issue comes up quite often for me.

Yes, having this available would be really useful at times. Sometimes I
had to resort to kprobes or good old printks.

> I would implement this with macros that record the place where a
> particular error has originated, and some way to query the last one
> (which wouldn't be 100% accurate, but good enough I guess).

The problem always has been how to implement this functionality in a
transparent way so the code does not become a mess. So if you have some
idea, I'd say go for it :)

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR