Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8976: Declare and use SDC1 pins

From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Date: Wed Feb 07 2024 - 07:15:36 EST


Il 06/02/24 23:36, Marijn Suijten ha scritto:
On 2024-02-06 19:58:50, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 21.01.2024 23:33, Marijn Suijten wrote:
Add the pinctrl states for SDC1 and use them on sdhc_1.

Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

[...]


@@ -840,6 +890,11 @@ sdhc_1: mmc@7824900 {
<&gcc GCC_SDCC1_APPS_CLK>,
<&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>;
clock-names = "iface", "core", "xo";
+
+ pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&sdc1_on_state>;
+ pinctrl-1 = <&sdc1_off_state>;

-names should go last


Konrad is technically correct as per [1] but, for consistency, since all of the
other nodes in msm8976.dtsi are following that order for pinctrl, this version of
the patch is correct.

That, unless anyone wants to reorder everything in this file as per [1], which
may or may not be worth the noise.

[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst

Regards,
Angelo

Per the cover letter:

- Moved pinctrl-names before pinctrl-N (Konrad);

You explicitly requested this in https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/60a40ace-d4e9-df74-88f9-4354d80efaac@xxxxxxxxxx/#t
but we also backtracked on it somewhat for consistency with other -names, and the general state of this file.

Maybe we should apply v1 of this specific patch?

- Marijn