Re: [PATCH] KVM: LAPIC: Recalculate apic map in batch

From: Vitaly Kuznetsov
Date: Tue Feb 18 2020 - 07:24:41 EST

Next message: Vitaly Kuznetsov: "Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: replace "fall through" with "return true" to indicate different case"
Previous message: Srinivas Kandagatla: "Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] nvmem: release the write-protect pin"
In reply to: Wanpeng Li: "[PATCH] KVM: LAPIC: Recalculate apic map in batch"
Next in thread: Wanpeng Li: "Re: [PATCH] KVM: LAPIC: Recalculate apic map in batch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> In the vCPU reset and set APIC_BASE MSR path, the apic map will be recalculated
> several times, each time it will consume 10+ us observed by ftrace in my
> non-overcommit environment since the expensive memory allocate/mutex/rcu etc
> operations. This patch optimizes it by recaluating apic map in batch, I hope
> this can benefit the serverless scenario which can frequently create/destroy
> VMs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx>

An alternative idea: instead of making every caller return bool and
every call site handle the result (once) just add a
KVM_REQ_APIC_MAP_RECALC flag or a boolean flag to struct kvm. I
understand it may not be that easy as it sounds as we may be conunting
on valid mapping somewhere before we actually get to handiling
KVM_REQ_APIC_MAP_RECALC but we may preserve *some*
recalculate_apic_map() calls (and make it reset KVM_REQ_APIC_MAP_RECALC).

> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index afcd30d..71f843a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static void kvm_apic_map_free(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> kvfree(map);
> }
>
> -static void recalculate_apic_map(struct kvm *kvm)
> +void kvm_recalculate_apic_map(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> struct kvm_apic_map *new, *old = NULL;
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> @@ -244,9 +244,10 @@ static void recalculate_apic_map(struct kvm *kvm)
> kvm_make_scan_ioapic_request(kvm);
> }
>
> -static inline void apic_set_spiv(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 val)
> +static inline bool apic_set_spiv(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 val)
> {
> bool enabled = val & APIC_SPIV_APIC_ENABLED;
> + bool need_recal = false;
>
> kvm_lapic_set_reg(apic, APIC_SPIV, val);
>
> @@ -257,20 +258,20 @@ static inline void apic_set_spiv(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 val)
> else
> static_key_slow_inc(&apic_sw_disabled.key);
>
> - recalculate_apic_map(apic->vcpu->kvm);
> + need_recal = true;
> }
> +
> + return need_recal;
> }
>
> static inline void kvm_apic_set_xapic_id(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u8 id)
> {
> kvm_lapic_set_reg(apic, APIC_ID, id << 24);
> - recalculate_apic_map(apic->vcpu->kvm);
> }
>
> static inline void kvm_apic_set_ldr(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 id)
> {
> kvm_lapic_set_reg(apic, APIC_LDR, id);
> - recalculate_apic_map(apic->vcpu->kvm);
> }
>
> static inline u32 kvm_apic_calc_x2apic_ldr(u32 id)
> @@ -286,7 +287,6 @@ static inline void kvm_apic_set_x2apic_id(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 id)
>
> kvm_lapic_set_reg(apic, APIC_ID, id);
> kvm_lapic_set_reg(apic, APIC_LDR, ldr);
> - recalculate_apic_map(apic->vcpu->kvm);
> }
>
> static inline int apic_lvt_enabled(struct kvm_lapic *apic, int lvt_type)
> @@ -1882,14 +1882,16 @@ static void apic_manage_nmi_watchdog(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 lvt0_val)
> int kvm_lapic_reg_write(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 reg, u32 val)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> + bool need_recal = false;
>
> trace_kvm_apic_write(reg, val);
>
> switch (reg) {
> case APIC_ID: /* Local APIC ID */
> - if (!apic_x2apic_mode(apic))
> + if (!apic_x2apic_mode(apic)) {
> kvm_apic_set_xapic_id(apic, val >> 24);
> - else
> + need_recal = true;
> + } else
> ret = 1;
> break;
>
> @@ -1903,16 +1905,17 @@ int kvm_lapic_reg_write(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 reg, u32 val)
> break;
>
> case APIC_LDR:
> - if (!apic_x2apic_mode(apic))
> + if (!apic_x2apic_mode(apic)) {
> kvm_apic_set_ldr(apic, val & APIC_LDR_MASK);
> - else
> + need_recal = true;
> + } else
> ret = 1;
> break;
>
> case APIC_DFR:
> if (!apic_x2apic_mode(apic)) {
> kvm_lapic_set_reg(apic, APIC_DFR, val | 0x0FFFFFFF);
> - recalculate_apic_map(apic->vcpu->kvm);
> + need_recal = true;
> } else
> ret = 1;
> break;
> @@ -1921,7 +1924,8 @@ int kvm_lapic_reg_write(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 reg, u32 val)
> u32 mask = 0x3ff;
> if (kvm_lapic_get_reg(apic, APIC_LVR) & APIC_LVR_DIRECTED_EOI)
> mask |= APIC_SPIV_DIRECTED_EOI;
> - apic_set_spiv(apic, val & mask);
> + if (apic_set_spiv(apic, val & mask))
> + need_recal = true;
> if (!(val & APIC_SPIV_APIC_ENABLED)) {
> int i;
> u32 lvt_val;
> @@ -2018,6 +2022,9 @@ int kvm_lapic_reg_write(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 reg, u32 val)
> break;
> }
>
> + if (need_recal)
> + kvm_recalculate_apic_map(apic->vcpu->kvm);
> +
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_lapic_reg_write);
> @@ -2143,10 +2150,11 @@ u64 kvm_lapic_get_cr8(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return (tpr & 0xf0) >> 4;
> }
>
> -void kvm_lapic_set_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 value)
> +bool kvm_lapic_set_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 value)
> {
> u64 old_value = vcpu->arch.apic_base;
> struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> + bool need_recal = false;
>
> if (!apic)
> value |= MSR_IA32_APICBASE_BSP;
> @@ -2157,7 +2165,7 @@ void kvm_lapic_set_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 value)
> kvm_update_cpuid(vcpu);
>
> if (!apic)
> - return;
> + return need_recal;

Just 'return false;' maybe?

>
> /* update jump label if enable bit changes */
> if ((old_value ^ value) & MSR_IA32_APICBASE_ENABLE) {
> @@ -2166,12 +2174,14 @@ void kvm_lapic_set_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 value)
> static_key_slow_dec_deferred(&apic_hw_disabled);
> } else {
> static_key_slow_inc(&apic_hw_disabled.key);
> - recalculate_apic_map(vcpu->kvm);
> }
> + need_recal = true;
> }
>
> - if (((old_value ^ value) & X2APIC_ENABLE) && (value & X2APIC_ENABLE))
> + if (((old_value ^ value) & X2APIC_ENABLE) && (value & X2APIC_ENABLE)) {
> kvm_apic_set_x2apic_id(apic, vcpu->vcpu_id);
> + need_recal = true;
> + }
>
> if ((old_value ^ value) & (MSR_IA32_APICBASE_ENABLE | X2APIC_ENABLE))
> kvm_x86_ops->set_virtual_apic_mode(vcpu);
> @@ -2182,6 +2192,8 @@ void kvm_lapic_set_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 value)
> if ((value & MSR_IA32_APICBASE_ENABLE) &&
> apic->base_address != APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE)
> pr_warn_once("APIC base relocation is unsupported by KVM");
> +
> + return need_recal;
> }
>
> void kvm_apic_update_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -2203,6 +2215,7 @@ void kvm_lapic_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> {
> struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> int i;
> + bool need_recal = false;
>
> if (!apic)
> return;
> @@ -2214,6 +2227,7 @@ void kvm_lapic_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> kvm_lapic_set_base(vcpu, APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE |
> MSR_IA32_APICBASE_ENABLE);
> kvm_apic_set_xapic_id(apic, vcpu->vcpu_id);
> + need_recal = true;
> }
> kvm_apic_set_version(apic->vcpu);
>
> @@ -2227,10 +2241,13 @@ void kvm_lapic_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> apic_manage_nmi_watchdog(apic, kvm_lapic_get_reg(apic, APIC_LVT0));
>
> kvm_lapic_set_reg(apic, APIC_DFR, 0xffffffffU);
> - apic_set_spiv(apic, 0xff);
> + if (apic_set_spiv(apic, 0xff))
> + need_recal = true;
> kvm_lapic_set_reg(apic, APIC_TASKPRI, 0);
> - if (!apic_x2apic_mode(apic))
> + if (!apic_x2apic_mode(apic)) {
> kvm_apic_set_ldr(apic, 0);
> + need_recal = true;
> + }
> kvm_lapic_set_reg(apic, APIC_ESR, 0);
> kvm_lapic_set_reg(apic, APIC_ICR, 0);
> kvm_lapic_set_reg(apic, APIC_ICR2, 0);
> @@ -2246,8 +2263,8 @@ void kvm_lapic_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> update_divide_count(apic);
> atomic_set(&apic->lapic_timer.pending, 0);
> if (kvm_vcpu_is_bsp(vcpu))
> - kvm_lapic_set_base(vcpu,
> - vcpu->arch.apic_base | MSR_IA32_APICBASE_BSP);
> + need_recal = kvm_lapic_set_base(vcpu,
> + vcpu->arch.apic_base | MSR_IA32_APICBASE_BSP);
> vcpu->arch.pv_eoi.msr_val = 0;
> apic_update_ppr(apic);
> if (vcpu->arch.apicv_active) {
> @@ -2258,6 +2275,9 @@ void kvm_lapic_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
>
> vcpu->arch.apic_arb_prio = 0;
> vcpu->arch.apic_attention = 0;
> +
> + if (need_recal)
> + kvm_recalculate_apic_map(vcpu->kvm);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2478,18 +2498,22 @@ int kvm_apic_set_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_lapic_state *s)
> {
> struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> int r;
> + bool need_recal = false;
>
> -
> - kvm_lapic_set_base(vcpu, vcpu->arch.apic_base);
> + need_recal = kvm_lapic_set_base(vcpu, vcpu->arch.apic_base);
> /* set SPIV separately to get count of SW disabled APICs right */
> - apic_set_spiv(apic, *((u32 *)(s->regs + APIC_SPIV)));
> + if (apic_set_spiv(apic, *((u32 *)(s->regs + APIC_SPIV))))
> + need_recal = true;
>
> r = kvm_apic_state_fixup(vcpu, s, true);
> - if (r)
> + if (r) {
> + if (need_recal)
> + kvm_recalculate_apic_map(vcpu->kvm);

This is an error condition, I'd suggest to drop need_recal check here
and do it unconditionally.

> return r;
> + }
> memcpy(vcpu->arch.apic->regs, s->regs, sizeof(*s));
>
> - recalculate_apic_map(vcpu->kvm);
> + kvm_recalculate_apic_map(vcpu->kvm);
> kvm_apic_set_version(vcpu);
>
> apic_update_ppr(apic);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> index ec6fbfe..58c07ad 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> @@ -76,8 +76,9 @@ void kvm_lapic_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event);
> u64 kvm_lapic_get_cr8(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_lapic_set_tpr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr8);
> void kvm_lapic_set_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> -void kvm_lapic_set_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 value);
> +bool kvm_lapic_set_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 value);
> u64 kvm_lapic_get_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_recalculate_apic_map(struct kvm *kvm);
> void kvm_apic_set_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvm_lapic_reg_write(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 reg, u32 val);
> int kvm_lapic_reg_read(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 offset, int len,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 79bc995..e961e65 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -349,7 +349,8 @@ int kvm_set_apic_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> return 1;
> }
>
> - kvm_lapic_set_base(vcpu, msr_info->data);
> + if (kvm_lapic_set_base(vcpu, msr_info->data))
> + kvm_recalculate_apic_map(vcpu->kvm);
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_set_apic_base);

--
Vitaly

Next message: Vitaly Kuznetsov: "Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: replace "fall through" with "return true" to indicate different case"
Previous message: Srinivas Kandagatla: "Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] nvmem: release the write-protect pin"
In reply to: Wanpeng Li: "[PATCH] KVM: LAPIC: Recalculate apic map in batch"
Next in thread: Wanpeng Li: "Re: [PATCH] KVM: LAPIC: Recalculate apic map in batch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]