Re: [PATCH v7 1/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-m4f: Add K3 AM64x SoCs

From: Rob Herring
Date: Fri Feb 02 2024 - 16:50:42 EST


On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 11:55:34AM -0600, Hari Nagalla wrote:
> K3 AM64x SoC has a Cortex M4F subsystem in the MCU voltage domain.
> The remote processor's life cycle management and IPC mechanisms are
> similar across the R5F and M4F cores from remote processor driver
> point of view. However, there are subtle differences in image loading
> and starting the M4F subsystems.
>
> The YAML binding document provides the various node properties to be
> configured by the consumers of the M4F subsystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@xxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Spelling corrections
> - Corrected to pass DT checks
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Missed spelling correction to commit message
>
> Changes since v3:
> - Removed unnecessary descriptions and used generic memory region names
> - Made mboxes and memory-region optional
> - Removed unrelated items from examples
>
> Changes since v4:
> - Rebased to the latest kernel-next tree
> - Added optional sram memory region for m4f device node
>
> Changes since v5:
> - None
>
> Changes since v6:
> - Removed blank line, fixed type for firm-ware property and binding check
> errors.
>
> link to v6:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230913111644.29889-2-hnagalla@xxxxxx/
>
> .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml | 138 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 138 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..645dbce3773b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: TI K3 M4F processor subsystems
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@xxxxxx>
> + - Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
> + Some K3 family SoCs have Arm Cortex M4F cores. AM64x is a SoC in K3
> + family with a M4F core. Typically safety oriented applications may use
> + the M4F core in isolation without an IPC. Where as some industrial and
> + home automation applications, may use the M4F core as a remote processor
> + with IPC communications.
> +
> +$ref: /schemas/arm/keystone/ti,k3-sci-common.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - ti,am64-m4fss
> +
> + power-domains:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + "#address-cells":
> + const: 2
> +
> + "#size-cells":
> + const: 2
> +
> + reg:
> + items:
> + - description: IRAM internal memory region
> + - description: DRAM internal memory region
> +
> + reg-names:
> + items:
> + - const: iram
> + - const: dram
> +
> + resets:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + firmware-name:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description: Name of firmware to load for the M4F core
> +
> + mboxes:
> + description: |

Don't need '|' if no formatting.

> + OMAP Mailbox specifier denoting the sub-mailbox, to be used for
> + communication with the remote processor. This property should match
> + with the sub-mailbox node used in the firmware image.
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + memory-region:
> + description: |
> + phandle to the reserved memory nodes to be associated with the
> + remoteproc device. The reserved memory nodes should be carveout nodes,
> + and should be defined with a "no-map" property as per the bindings in
> + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.yaml

This has moved to dtschema. I'd just drop the file name.

> + Optional memory regions available for firmware specific purposes.
> + maxItems: 8
> + items:
> + - description: regions used for DMA allocations like vrings, vring buffers
> + and memory dedicated to firmware's specific purposes.
> + additionalItems: true

I think you want just:

minItems: 1
maxItems: 8

> +
> + sram:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> + maxItems: 4
> + items:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description: |
> + phandles to reserved on-chip SRAM regions. The regions should be
> + defined as child nodes of the respective SRAM node, and
> + should be defined as per the generic bindings in,
> + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - reg-names
> + - ti,sci
> + - ti,sci-dev-id
> + - ti,sci-proc-ids
> + - resets
> + - firmware-name
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + reserved-memory {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + mcu_m4fss_dma_memory_region: m4f-dma-memory@9cb00000 {
> + compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> + reg = <0x00 0x9cb00000 0x00 0x100000>;
> + no-map;
> + };
> +
> + mcu_m4fss_memory_region: m4f-memory@9cc00000 {
> + compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> + reg = <0x00 0x9cc00000 0x00 0xe00000>;
> + no-map;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + soc {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + mailbox0_cluster0: mailbox-0 {
> + #mbox-cells = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + remoteproc@5000000 {
> + compatible = "ti,am64-m4fss";
> + reg = <0x00 0x5000000 0x00 0x30000>,
> + <0x00 0x5040000 0x00 0x10000>;
> + reg-names = "iram", "dram";
> + ti,sci = <&dmsc>;
> + ti,sci-dev-id = <9>;
> + ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x18 0xff>;
> + resets = <&k3_reset 9 1>;
> + firmware-name = "am62-mcu-m4f0_0-fw";
> + mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster0>, <&mbox_m4_0>;
> + memory-region = <&mcu_m4fss_dma_memory_region>,
> + <&mcu_m4fss_memory_region>;
> + sram = <&oc_sram>;
> + };
> + };
> --
> 2.34.1
>